The Role of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors on Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recently, significant advances have been made in its treatment; however, diuretics remain the cornerstone in managing congestion in HF. Although diuretic resistance poses a significant challenge in the management of HF and is associated with poor outcomes, only limited alternative pharmaceutical options are available in clinical practice. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on diuretic resistance in HF patients. The primary emphasis is placed on clinical data that assess the impact of SGLT-2 inhibitors on fluid balance, symptom improvement, and clinical outcomes and secondarily on safety profile and potential adverse effects associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor use in acute decompensated HF. The current evidence on the efficacy of SGLT-2 on diuretic resistance remains controversial. Findings from observational and randomized studies are quite heterogenous; however, they converge on the notion that although SGLT-2 inhibitors show promise for mitigating diuretic resistance in HF, their diuretic effect may not be potent enough to be widely used to relieve objective signs of congestion in patients with HF. Importantly, the introduction of SGLT-2 inhibitors in HF treatment appears to be generally well tolerated, with manageable adverse effects. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms and the possible beneficial impact of SGLT-2 inhibitors on diuretic resistance in HF.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics under strict monotherapy.

Previous work comparing safety and effectiveness outcomes for new initiators of angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and thiazides demonstrated more favorable outcomes for thiazides, although cohort definitions allowed for addition of a second antihypertensive medication after a week of monotherapy. Here, we modify the monotherapy definition, imposing exit from cohorts upon addition of another antihypertensive medication. We determine hazard ratios (HR) for 55 safety and effectiveness outcomes over six databases and compare results to earlier findings. We find, for all primary outcomes, statistically significant differences in effectiveness between ACEi and thiazides were not replicated (HRs: 1.11, 1.06, 1.12 for acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization with heart failure and stroke, respectively). While statistical significance is similarly lost for several safety outcomes, the safety profile of thiazides remains more favorable. Our results indicate a less striking difference in effectiveness of thiazides compared to ACEi and reflect some sensitivity to the monotherapy cohort definition modification.

Risk of CKD among patients with DM taking diuretics or SGLT2i: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of CKD and renal function declines using a combination of diuretics and SGLT2i. METHODS: We selected the data of subjects who had at least two outpatient records or at least one inpatient record for DM treatment as the DM group from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Patients receiving versus not receiving SGLT2i were defined as the SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i cohorts, respectively. The patients in the two groups were matched 1:1 through propensity score matching based on age, sex, year of index date, and comorbidities. RESULTS: The diuretics-only group had a higher risk of CKD (aHR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.68-3.61) compared to the neither SGLT2i nor diuretics group, while the both SGLT2i and diuretics group and the SGLT2i only group had lower risks (aHR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; aHR, 0.26, 95% CI, 0.17-0.40) than the diuretics-only group. The SGLT2i-only group had a lower risk (aHR, 0.58, 95% CI, 0.36-0.94) than the both SGLT2i and diuretics group. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that diuretics could raise the risk of CKD in diabetic patients, but when used in combination with SGLT2i, they continue to offer protection against CKD.

Could admission level of uric acid predict total diuretic dose in acute heart failure?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that increases in serum UA levels are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF); the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum uric acid and total diuretic dose received during hospitalization in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of heart failure. The main purpose of this study is to determine the role of uric acid as a biomarker that can be a substitute for pro-BNP in clinical evaluation and the need for diuretics in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure. METHODS: After approving the plan in the Research Council of the Heart Department and obtaining an ethical code from the Regional Committee on Research Ethics (Human Subjects Studies), the researcher referred to the archives of our center, the case of 100 patients diagnosed with acute heart failure. Cardiac patients were selected, and the information required for the study was collected using a pre-prepared data collection form, and the information was entered into SPSS software after categorization and appropriate analysis and statistical tests were performed on it. Were performed and in all statistical tests the statistical significance level was considered 0.05: RESULTS: 100 patients with acute heart failure were included in this study with a mean age of 63.43 ± 14.78 years. 66% of them were men. The mean dose of furosemide in these patients was 680.92 ± 377.47 mg and the mean serum uric acid level in these patients was 8.55 ± 2.50 mg / dL. In the study of the relationship between the variables, there was a significant relationship between the dose of furosemide received with the serum level of serum uric acid (P = 0.017, r = 0.248 and P = 0.009, r = -0.267, respectively). There is also a significant relationship between serum uric acid level and patient mortality (P = 0.013, r = 0.247). However this relationship lost its significance after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: There is a significant relationship between serum uric acid level and diuretic use. However, in-hospital mortality is not related to uric acid levels at admission.

Severe methotrexate toxicity in elderly patients under diuretics.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the toxicity of low-dose methotrexate (MTX), an uncommon, but life-threatening event. METHODS: We analysed the presentation, course and risk factors of all patients admitted to the rheumatology ward with severe low-dose MTX toxicity. These patients were compared with patients without signs of relevant MTX toxicity. RESULTS: The 12 patients admitted for MTX toxicity included 7 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 2 with psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis, 2 patients with giant cell arteritis and 1 with myositis. 1 patient died from infections, while 11 survived under folinic acid administration. All patients suffering from severe MTX toxicity were older than 70 years and were therefore compared with 400 patients who were also older than 70 years, but without MTX toxicity. Of these 400 control patients, the group of patients not on MTX (n=232) had more renal impairment than the group of patients on MTX (n=168). Compared with the 168 MTX-treated patients without toxicity, the 12 patients with life-threatening toxic events had a lower median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the routine visit preceding the acute event (64 (range 32-77) vs 69 (range 8 to >90) mL/min x 1.73, p=0.0251). A multivariate analysis found that patients with toxicity were more frequently treated with diuretics (6/12 vs 24/168), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 10/12 vs 70/168) and levetiracetam (2/12 vs 1/168). CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 70 years with lower eGFR and being on diuretics, but also on PPIs and levetiracetam, have a significantly higher risk for MTX toxicity.

Diuretic Use in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) significantly enhances the possibility of both acute and chronic rejection of the transplanted organ, thereby reducing patient quality of life and survival rates. To prevent and manage oliguria in renal transplant patients, loop diuretics are presently commonly used. In our study, we assessed the possible impact of furosemide on the incidence of DGF among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: A review of medical records was conducted to examine demographic characteristics and kidney transplant outcomes in an adult (older than 18 years old) population. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), whereas the secondary objective was to compare the creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at day 30 and day 90 post-transplantation in patients who were administered furosemide vs those who were not. RESULTS: This study included 330 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Furosemide was administered to 169 (51.3%), whereas 161(48.7%) patients did not receive continued dose of diuretic postoperatively. The rate of DGF was significantly higher in patients who received furosemide than in those who did not (furosemide 44% vs 4%; P < .001). The eGFR was lower in the furosemide group compared to the no furosemide group at day 30 (56 ± 24 vs 71 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001) and day 90 (66 ± 27 vs 78 ± 25 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that there is no benefit in treating an oliguric AKI with furosemide. Administration of furosemide, especially in high doses, may increase the risk of toxicity, delay dialysis, and increase the length of stay.

Influence of vasopressin receptor antagonists on triple-whammy acute kidney injury: A VigiBase analysis.

Although diuretics play an important role in triple-whammy acute kidney injury (AKI), it is unclear whether the type of diuretic influences the risk of triple-whammy AKI. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether vasopressin receptor antagonists affect triple-whammy AKI. This cross-sectional study used disproportionality analysis of VigiBase data to assess the risk of AKI with various diuretics. Although multiple logistic regression analysis showed that aldosterone antagonists (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% CI 2.01-2.37), loop diuretics (OR 4.40, 95% CI 4.07-4.76) and thiazide diuretics (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.83-2.15) increased the risk of AKI in patients who received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), vasopressin receptor antagonists did not increase the risk of AKI in those patients. Vasopressin receptor antagonists might not influence the development of triple-whammy AKI.

Association of a calcium channel blocker and diuretic prescribing cascade with adverse events: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing cascades occur when a drug adverse event is misinterpreted as a new medical condition and a second, potentially unnecessary drug, is prescribed to treat the adverse event. The population-level consequences of prescribing cascades remain unknown. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used linked health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. The study included community-dwelling adults, 66 years of age or older with hypertension and no history of heart failure (HF) or diuretic use in the prior year, newly dispensed a calcium channel blocker (CCB). Individuals subsequently dispensed a diuretic within 90 days of incident CCB dispensing were classified as the prescribing cascade group, and compared to those not dispensed a diuretic, classified as the non-prescribing cascade group. Those with and without a prescribing cascade were matched one-to-one on the propensity score and sex. The primary outcome was a serious adverse event (SAE), which was the composite of emergency room visits and hospitalizations in the 90-day follow-up period. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SAE using an Andersen-Gill recurrent events regression model. RESULTS: Among 39,347 older adults with hypertension and no history of HF who were newly dispensed a CCB, 1881 (4.8%) had a new diuretic dispensed within 90 days after CCB initiation. Compared to the non-prescribing cascade group, those in the prescribing cascade group had higher rates of SAEs (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43). CONCLUSIONS: The CCB-diuretic prescribing cascade was associated with an increased rate of SAEs, suggesting harm beyond prescribing a second drug therapy. Our study raises awareness of the downstream impact of the CCB-diuretic prescribing cascade at a population level and provides an opportunity for clinicians who identify this prescribing cascade to review their patients' medications to determine if they can be optimized.

Thiazide Diuretics and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Evidence from clinical trials and observational studies on the association between thiazide diuretics and colorectal cancer risk is conflicting. We aimed to determine whether thiazide diuretics are associated with an increased colorectal cancer risk compared with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (dCCBs). A population-based, new-user cohort was assembled using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Between 1990-2018, we compared thiazide diuretic initiators with dCCB initiators and estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer using Cox proportional hazard models. Models were weighted using standardized morbidity ratio weights generated from calendar time-specific propensity scores. The cohort included 377,760 thiazide diuretic initiators and 364,300 dCCB initiators, generating 3,619,883 person-years of follow-up. Compared with dCCBs, thiazide diuretics were not associated with colorectal cancer (weighted HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.04). Secondary analyses yielded similar results, although an increased risk was observed among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (weighted HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.13, 5.35) and potentially polyps (weighted HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 0.93, 2.30). Compared with dCCBs, thiazide diuretics were not associated with an overall increased colorectal cancer risk. While these findings provide some reassurance, research is needed to corroborate the elevated risks observed among patients with inflammatory bowel disease and history of polyps.

Use of furosemide in preterm neonates with acute kidney injury is associated with increased mortality: results from the TINKER registry.

BACKGROUND: Diuretics are commonly used in neonatal AKI with the rationale to decrease positive fluid balance in critically sick neonates. The patterns of furosemide use vary among hospitals, which necessitates the need for a well-designed study. METHODS: The TINKER (The Indian Iconic Neonatal Kidney Educational Registry) study provides a database, spanning 14 centres across India since August 2018. Admitted neonates (≤ 28 days) receiving intravenous fluids for at least 48 h were included. Neonatal KDIGO criteria were used for the AKI diagnosis. Detailed clinical and laboratory parameters were collected, including the indications of furosemide use, detailed dosing, and the duration of furosemide use (in days). RESULTS: A total of 600 neonates with AKI were included. Furosemide was used in 8.8% of the neonates (53/600). Common indications of furosemide use were significant cardiac disease, fluid overload, oliguria, BPD, RDS, hypertension, and hyperkalemia. The odds of mortality was higher in neonates < 37 weeks gestational age with AKI who received furosemide compared to those who did not receive furosemide 3.78 [(1.60-8.94); p = 0.003; univariate analysis] and [3.30 (1.11-9.82); p = 0.03]; multivariate logistic regression]. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm neonates with AKI, mortality was independently associated with furosemide treatment. The furosemide usage rates were higher in neonates with associated co-morbidities, i.e. significant cardiac diseases or surgical interventions. Sicker babies needed more resuscitation at birth, and died early, and hence needed shorter furosemide courses. Thus, survival probability was higher in neonates treated with long furosemide courses vs. short courses.

Timing of Worsening Renal Function in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure Exacerbation Who Were Being Treated With Intravenous Diuretic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective observational study investigated the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF) in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) and treated with intravenous diuretics in Japan.Methods and Results: Associations between WRF at any point and HF treatments, and the effects of WRF on outcomes were evaluated (Diagnosis Procedure Combination database). Of 1,788 patients analyzed (mean [±SD] age 80.5±10.2 years; 54.4% male), 641 (35.9%) had WRF during a course of hospitalization for worsening HF: 208 (32.4%) presented with WRF before admission (BA-WRF; estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by ≥25% from baseline at least once between 30 days prior to admission and admission); 44 (6.9%) had WRF that persisted before and after admission (P-WRF); and 389 (60.7%) had WRF develop after admission (AA-WRF). Delayed initial diuretic administration, higher maximum doses of intravenous diuretics during hospitalization, and diuretic readministration during hospitalization were associated with a significantly higher incidence of AA-WRF. Patients with WRF at any time point were at higher risk of death during hospitalization compared with patients without WRF, with adjusted hazard ratios of 3.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-5.69) for BA-WRF, 3.23 (95% CI 2.21-4.71) for AA-WRF, and 13.16 (95% CI 8.19-21.15) for P-WRF (all P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of WRF occurred before admission for acute HF; there was no difference in mortality between patients with BA-WRF and AA-WRF.

Thiazide diuretics and primary hyperparathyroidism.

Thiazide diuretics exert a natriuretic and diuretic effect by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the distal convoluted tubule. Furthermore, thiazide diuretics affect renal calcium handling by increasing calcium reabsorption, leading to hypocalciuria. The effect that thiazide diuretics exert on parathyroid hormone secretion is controversial. Some studies found parathyroid hormone levels were suppressed with the use of thiazide diuretics, while others found that thiazides were associated with initial parathyroid hormone suppression followed by raised parathyroid hormone levels. This makes the relationship between thiazide diuretics and primary hyperparathyroidism interesting. If a patient is taking thiazide diuretics, this may make it harder to establish the aetiology of hypercalcaemia and may unmask normocalcaemic or mild primary hyperparathyroidism. Thiazide diuretics may have a beneficial role in the diagnosis of patients with concomitant hyperparathyroidism and hypercalciuria by distinguishing secondary hyperparathyroidism caused by hypercalciuria from normocalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism. In addition, thiazide diuretics may have a role in managing patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have an indication for parathyroidectomy in view of significant hypercalciuria, but are unfit for surgery.

Renal safety and survival among acutely ill hospitalized patients treated by blockers of the Renin-Angiotensin axis or loop diuretics: a single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Concern exists regarding the renal safety of blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) during acute illness, especially in the presence of volume depletion and hemodynamic instability. METHODS: We explored the impact of loop diuretics and RAS blockers on the likelihood of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) or acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) among inpatients. Adjusted odds ratio for AKI, AKR and mortality was calculated, using logistic regression models, with subgroup analysis for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, corrected for blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: 53,289 patients were included. RAS blockade was associated with reduced adjusted odds ratio for both AKI (0.76, CI 0.70-0.83) AKR (0.55, 0.52-0.58), and mortality within 30 days (0.44, 0.41-0.48), whereas loop diuretics were associated with increased risk of AKI (3.75, 3.42-4.12) and mortality (1.71, 1.58-1.85) and reduced AKR (0.71, 0.66-0.75). Comparable impact of RAS blockers and loop diuretics on renal outcomes and death was found among 6,069 patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2. RAS inhibition and diuretics tended to increase the adjusted odds ratios for AKI and to reduce the likelihood of AKR in hypotensive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced blood pressure, RAS blockers and diuretics affect the odds of developing AKI or AKR among inpatients, suggesting possible disruption in renal functional reserve (RFR). As long as blood pressure is maintained, RAS inhibition seems to be safe and renoprotective in this population, irrespective of kidney function upon admission, and is associated with reduced mortality.

Use of loop diuretics in patients with chronic heart failure: an observational overview.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the use and dose of loop diuretics (LDs) across the entire ejection fraction (EF) spectrum in a large, 'real-world' cohort of chronic heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS: A total of 10 366 patients with chronic HF from 34 Dutch outpatient HF clinics were analysed regarding diuretic use and diuretic dose. Data regarding daily diuretic dose were stratified by furosemide dose equivalent (FDE)>80 mg or ≤80 mg. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between diuretic dose and clinical features. RESULTS: In this cohort, 8512 (82.1%) patients used diuretics, of which 8179 (96.1%) used LDs. LD use was highest among HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) patients (81.1%) followed by HF with mild-reduced EF (76.1%) and HF with preserved ejection fraction EF (73.8%, p<0.001). Among all LDs users, the median FDE was 40 mg (IQR: 40-80). The results of the multivariable analysis showed that New York Heart Association classes III and IV and diabetes mellitus were one of the strongest determinants of an FDE >80 mg, across all HF categories. Renal impairment was associated with a higher FDE across the entire EF spectrum. CONCLUSION: In this large registry of real-world HF patients, LD use was highest among HFrEF patients. Advanced symptoms, diabetes mellitus and worse renal function were significantly associated with a higher diuretic dose regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Efficacy and safety of postoperative preemptive use of tolvaptan for patients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Optimal choice of diuretics in perioperative management remains unclear in enhanced recovery after liver surgery. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan (oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist) in postoperative management of patients with liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The patients clinically diagnosed with liver cirrhosis were included in this study. Clinical outcomes of 51 prospective cohort managed with a modified postoperative protocol using tolvaptan (validation group) were compared with 83 patients treated with a conventional management protocol (control group). RESULTS: Postoperative urine output were significantly larger and excessive body weight increase were reduced with no impairment in renal function or serum sodium levels in the validation group. Although the total amount of discharge and trend of serum albumin level were not significantly different among the groups, global incidence of postoperative morbidity was less frequent (19.6% vs. 44.6%, P=0.005) and postoperative stay was significantly shorter (8 days vs.10 days, P=0.008) in the validation group compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan could be safely used for the patients with injured liver in postoperative management after hepatectomy and potentially advantageous in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery with its strong diuretic effect and better fluid management.

Loop diuretics improve conditions of dialysis inception in advanced CKD: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diuretics can reduce fluid overload but their effects on conditions of dialysis start remain elusive. We aimed to determine whether loop diuretics exposure in the year before inception can delay the need for dialysis, affect the conditions of dialysis start, and cause early mortality three months after initiation in pre-dialysis patients. METHODS: All adult patients starting dialysis from 2009 to 2015 in the REIN registry were included. Three subgroups were defined according to diuretics exposure: "continuous", "stopped", or "no diuretics" over the year before inception and compared for pre-dialysis hospitalization rates, and 3-month mortality after dialysis. RESULTS: Among 59,302 patients, we found fewer emergency initiations of dialysis in the continuous diuretics group than in the stopped diuretics and no diuretics groups: 9492 (27.5%) vs 1905 (32.3%) and 5226 (35.0%), respectively; p < 0.0001. In the continuous diuretics group, there were fewer starts on central venous catheters than in the stopped diuretics and no diuretics groups: 16,677 (49.4%) vs. 3246 (56.0%) vs. 8,639 (58.4%); p < 0.0001. Patients with continuous diuretic exposure had a lower hospitalization rate than the stopped diuretics group in the year prior to dialysis, except for heart failure. The unadjusted 3-month hazard ratio of mortality after dialysis inception was significantly higher in the "no diuretics" or "stopped diuretics" groups compared with "continuous diuretics", but the excess of risk was blunted after adjustment for emergency start and pre-dialysis visits to a nephrologist. CONCLUSION: Continuous loop diuretics exposure in the year before dialysis was associated with better conditions of dialysis inception, and possibly lower mortality rates in the three months after inception.

Effect of antihypertensive medications on the risk of open-angle glaucoma.

The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of antihypertensive medication on risks of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) among patients diagnosed with hypertension (HTN). A total of 5,195 patients, who were diagnosed with HTN between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015, and subsequently diagnosed with OAG, were selected for analysis. For each OAG patient, 5 non-glaucomatous, hypertensive controls were matched (n = 25,975) in hypertension diagnosis date, residential area, insurance type and economic status. Antihypertensive medications were stratified into 5 types: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), ß-blockers and diuretics. Relative risks were calculated. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, lifestyle, comorbidities, blood pressure (BP), follow-up duration, and use of other types of antihypertensive drugs, ARB and CCB were found to slightly increase OAG risks (RR 1.1087 (95% CI 1.0293-1.1942); 1.0694 (1.0077-1.1349), respectively). Combinations of ARB with diuretics (1.0893 (1.0349-1.1466)) and CCB (1.0548 (1.0122-1.0991)) also increased OAG risks. The risks for OAG were found to increase by antihypertensive medication use, but the effects appeared to be small. Further studies are necessary to identify the associations of increased BP, medication and therapeutic effect with OAG.